AI-Rehab: A Framework for AI Driven Neurorehabilitation Training - The Profiling Challenge

First page of “AI-Rehab: A Framework for AI Driven Neurorehabilitation Training - The Profiling Challenge”

Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies

https://doi.org/10.5220/0009369108450853

1. Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The journal of symbolic logic, 50(2):510-530.
2. Bergeron, M. F., Landset, S., Tarpin-Bernard, F., Ashford, C. B., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., and Ashford, J. W. (2019). Episodic-memory performance in machine learning modeling for predicting cognitive health status classi- fication. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 70(1):277- 286. Bermúdez i Badia, S., Fluet, G. G., Llorens, R., and Deutsch, J. E. (2016). Virtual reality for sensorimo- tor rehabilitation post stroke: Design principles and evidence. In Neurorehabilitation technology, pages 573-603. Springer.
3. Booth, R., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I., and Wassermann, R. (2010). Contraction core for horn belief change: pre- liminary report. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Bott, N. T. and Kramer, A. (2017). Cognitive rehabilitation. Encyclopedia of Geropsychology, pages 544-551.
5. Carod-Artal, J., Egido, J. A., González, J. L., and Varela de Seijas, E. (2000). Quality of life among stroke sur- vivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit. Stroke, 31(12):2995-3000.
6. Chi, C.-L., Zeng, W., Oh, W., Borson, S., Lenskaia, T., Shen, X., and Tonellato, P. J. (2017). Personalized long-term prediction of cognitive function: Using se- quential assessments to improve model performance. Journal of biomedical informatics, 76:78-86.
7. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., Felicetti, T., Gi- acino, J. T., Harley, J. P., Harrington, D. E., et al. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: rec- ommendations for clinical practice. Archives of phys- ical medicine and rehabilitation, 81(12):1596-1615.
8. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005). Evidence- based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of physi- cal medicine and rehabilitation, 86(8):1681-1692.
9. Cicerone, K. D., Langenbahn, D. M., Braden, C., Malec, J. F., Kalmar, K., Fraas, M., Felicetti, T., Laatsch, L., Harley, J. P., Bergquist, T., et al. (2011). Evidence- based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Archives of physi- cal medicine and rehabilitation, 92(4):519-530.
10. Cumming, T. B., Marshall, R. S., and Lazar, R. M. (2013). Stroke, cognitive deficits, and rehabilitation: still an incomplete picture. International Journal of stroke, 8(1):38-45.
11. Delgrande, J. and Wassermann, R. (2010). Horn clause contraction functions: Belief set and belief base ap- proaches. In Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reason- ing.
12. Delgrande, J. P. (2008). Horn clause belief change: Con- traction functions. In KR, pages 156-165.
13. Delgrande, J. P. and Schaub, T. (2003). A consistency- based approach for belief change. Artificial Intelli- gence, 151(1-2):1-41.
14. Faria, A. L. and Bermúdez i Badia, S. (2015). Development and evaluation of a web-based cognitive task gener- ator for personalized cognitive training: a proof of concept study with stroke patients. In Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Pa- tients Rehabilitation Research Techniques, pages 1-4. ACM. Faria, A. L., Pinho, M. S., and Bermúdez i Badia, S. (2018). Capturing expert knowledge for the personalization of cognitive rehabilitation: Study combining com- putational modeling and a participatory design strat- egy. JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 5(2):e10714.
15. Fermé, E. and Hansson, S. O. (2011). Agm 25 years. Jour- nal of Philosophical Logic, 40(2):295-331.
16. Fermé, E. and Hansson, S. O. (2018). Belief Change: In- troduction and Overview. Springer.
17. Fernández-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., and Amorim, D. (2014). Do we need hundreds of classi- fiers to solve real world classification problems? The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1):3133- 3181.
18. Fernández-Delgado, M., Sirsat, M., Cernadas, E., Alawadi, S., Barro, S., and Febrero-Bande, M. (2018). An extensive experimental survey of regression methods. Neural Networks.
19. Freitas, S., Batista, S., Afonso, A. C., Simões, M. R., de Sousa, L., Cunha, L., and Santana, I. (2018). The montreal cognitive assessment (moca) as a screening test for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25(1):57-70.
20. Freitas, S., Prieto, G., Simões, M. R., and Santana, I. (2014). Psychometric properties of the montreal cog- nitive assessment (moca): an analysis using the rasch model. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(1):65-83.
21. Freitas, S., Prieto, G., Simões, M. R., and Santana, I. (2015). Scaling cognitive domains of the montreal cognitive assessment: an analysis using the partial credit model. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(5):435-447.
22. Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., Duro, D., and Santana, I. (2012a). Montreal cognitive assessment (moca): validation study for frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 25(3):146- 154.
23. Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., and Santana, I. (2011). Montreal cognitive assessment (moca): normative study for the portuguese population. Journal of clin- ical and experimental neuropsychology, 33(9):989- 996.
24. Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., and Santana, I. (2013). Montreal cognitive assessment: validation study for mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 27(1):37-43.
25. Freitas, S., Simoes, M. R., Alves, L., Vicente, M., and Santana, I. (2012b). Montreal cognitive assessment (moca): validation study for vascular dementia. Jour- nal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(6):1031-1040.
26. Freitas, S., Simoes, M. R., Marôco, J., Alves, L., and San- tana, I. (2012c). Construct validity of the montreal cognitive assessment (moca). Journal of the Interna- tional Neuropsychological Society, 18(2):242-250.
27. George, D. R. and Whitehouse, P. J. (2011). Marketplace of memory: what the brain fitness technology industry says about us and how we can do better. The Geron- tologist, 51(5):590-596.
28. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The el- ements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer Science & Business Media.
29. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., and Wang, Y. (2017). Arti- ficial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and fu- ture. Stroke and vascular neurology, 2(4):230-243.
30. Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A. O. (1991). Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artifi- cial Intelligence, 52(3):263-294.
31. Ko, H., Ihm, J.-J., Kim, H.-G., Initiative, A. D. N., et al. (2019). Cognitive profiling related to cerebral amy- loid beta burden using machine learning approaches. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 11.
32. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learn- ing. nature, 521(7553):436-444.
33. Morris, K., Hacker, V., and Lincoln, N. B. (2012). The validity of the addenbrooke's cognitive examination- revised (ace-r) in acute stroke. Disability and rehabil- itation, 34(3):189-195.
34. Nakamura, J. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow the- ory and research. Handbook of positive psychology, pages 195-206.
35. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbon- neau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., and Chertkow, H. (2005). The montreal cognitive as- sessment, moca: a brief screening tool for mild cogni- tive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4):695-699.
36. Pagnucco, M. (2006). Knowledge compilation for belief change. In Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 90-99. Springer.
37. Parsons, T. D. (2015). Ecological validity in virtual reality- based neuropsychological assessment. In Encyclope- dia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edi- tion, pages 1006-1015. IGI Global.
38. Paulino, T., i Badia, S. B., and Cameirão, M. (2019). Us- ability evaluation of an integrative exergaming system for the senior population. In 2019 5th Experiment In- ternational Conference (exp. at'19), pages 286-291. IEEE.
39. Paulino, T., Muñoz, J., Bermúdez i Badia, S., and Cameirão, M. S. (2018). Design of an integrative system for con- figurable exergames targeting the senior population. In International Conference on Human Systems Engi- neering and Design: Future Trends and Applications, pages 287-292. Springer.
40. Peppas, P. and Williams, M.-A. (2016). Kinetic consistency and relevance in belief revision. In European Confer- ence on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, pages 401- 414. Springer.
41. Schwind, N., Inoue, K., Konieczny, S., Lagniez, J.-M., and Marquis, P. (2019). What has been said? identifying the change formula in a belief revision scenario. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-19, pages 1865-1871. International Joint Conferences on Artifi- cial Intelligence Organization.
42. Solana, J., Cáceres, C., García-Molina, A., Opisso, E., Roig, T., Tormos, J. M., and Gómez, E. J. (2014). Im- proving brain injury cognitive rehabilitation by per- sonalized telerehabilitation services: Guttmann neu- ropersonal trainer. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 19(1):124-131.
43. Williams, M.-A. and Sims, A. (2000). Saten: An object- oriented web-based revision and extraction engine. arXiv preprint cs/0003059.
44. Wilson, A. and McDonagh, J. (2013). Application of the principles of gamification to facilitate acquisition of self-management skills in young people with long- term medical conditions. In European Conference on Games Based Learning, page 579. Academic Confer- ences International Limited.
45. Zhuang, Z. Q., Pagnucco, M., and Meyer, T. (2007). Imple- menting iterated belief change via prime implicates. In Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, pages 507-518. Springer.