Raphael ThysWhat is it that we know, we know we don’t know and we don’t know we don’t know (8)? Illustration by the author, source by freepik.com.
“Every year we go into the same room with the same information and the same questions .. what do you think happens? Every year we come out with the same ideas” — frustrated workshop facilitator
I assume this scenario is quite common.
Creativity is limited to what we already know, it is only the re-combination of available information and experience. Creativity is not magic, it doesn’t produce ideas out of thin air.
In addition, most competitors think the same way, because they use the same methods and the same questions to find the same insights.
Outperforming your competition is not as much about who is the most creative or who has the deepest data. It’s as much about who can see something nobody else can.
Currently the trend is to apply a lot of data to buy our way out of this problem. Hoping that the machine will magically see connections our human brains can’t.
But machines are only reflections of our own values, ideas and biases (1). If we are staring down one rabbit hole the machine will only help us dig deeper .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons_of_Math_Destruction
(Unless you have a pretty magical machine)
We should therefore redesign our creative workshops. From combining information into ideas, to exploring questions we need to ask and information we don’t have.
There is a simple way to unlock this behavior: just ask “what has to be true for x to be true”, where x is your strategy, an existing product, something you are already doing .. anything.
(2). The MVP is dead. Long live the RAT, Rik Higham
(3). What would have to be true, Roger L. Martin
One of the most productive ways to learn something new is experimentation.
The purpose of an experiment is not to confirm that you are correct (sometimes it is), but it should most often be used to surprise you.
To help you learn something that you didn’t know two minutes prior.
And the way to do that is to reduce the cost of an experiment to almost zero (because if experiments are expensive the organization will more likely prioritize experiments confirming their existing knowledge).
The real measure of success is the number of experiments that can be crowded into 24 hours. — Thomas Alva Edison
With cheap and fast experiments the company can explore hypotheses and assumptions they never tested before, learn new things, capture new insights, venture into new areas.
With their new learnings they can combine both information they never had before with questions they never asked before.
Researchers suggest it is uncertainty, or when you think you know something then discover you don’t, that leads to curiosity and learning outcomes. — Celeste Kidd, assistant professor of psychology at UC Berkeley, Neurosciencenews.com
In short:
We only know what we know, and we know very little.
We need to shift our focus from creativity to insights and questions. And experimentation is a low hanging fruit and one of the fastest tracks we can use to get us there.
Recommended places to start your experimentation journey:
(4). Experimentation works, Stefan H. Thomke
(5). How managers can build a culture of experimentation, Frank V. Cespedes and Neil Hoyne
(7). Get Comfortable Breaking Your Product, Rik Higham
All illustrations by the author.